Watchung Plaza
Montclair, NJ 07042
973.744.7177
Aloha,
The Beamers found themselves
with a nice, light book to help while away the lazy summer days, "Old
Man's War" by John Scalzi. Of course, our discussion was anything but
light as we went after the essentials of science fiction and fantasy,
the demands of military fiction, the strengths and weaknesses of first
novels, the advantages of sequels, and the believability of 1-inch-tall
intelligent aliens. Appropriately for a book about future wars, we
battled our best to tease out its secrets and to test our own
convictions and preferences. As a special treat, we were joined by a
guest, Phil De Parto of the SF Association of Bergen County (www.sfabc.org), who gave us much interesting information about the SFABC's activities as well as staying to join in our debate with glee.
The
debate opened with my provocative interpretation of the book as a
fantasy novel despite its obvious sf elements, claiming that we had a
story in which a young apprentice was granted a magic wand and sent off
to different places to slay monsters. This depiction of the book was
immediately challenged, and it set us off in quest of defining sf and
fantasy and how they differ (as well as how they relate, which is
equally important to our discussion and to our affections for the
combined genre of speculative fiction). Jon first opined that sf was
speculative fiction set in the future, while fantasy was set in the
past. As we dissected that option to pieces, he offered a more
functional discriminator, positing that sf and fantasy differ in the
access to power, saying that sf makes its abilities freely available,
where fantasy reserves its significant traits to specially designated
individuals. This comparison helps explain why fantasies are
frequently set in pre-industrial worlds, where the idea of mass
production is absent. Phil opted to challenge my definition of the
need for sf to logically and rigorously work out the consequences of
the author's speculative change (like the nano-tech super-rifle of
Scalzi's work, that seemed more magic wand than infantry weapon to me),
pointing out that accepting genre tropes and classic ideas (faster than
light travel, for example) was generally accepted by readers to free
authors from having to bog down their books with infodumps. Otherwise,
much sf would have to be tossed out of the genre, if my rule were to be
logically and rigorously applied. In general, the Beamer consensus did
grant that "Old Man's War" should be considered as sf, but we did see
that Scalzi left himself open to many challenges due to omitting much
of his backstory, producing a book that Kevin critiqued as "facile"
even as he enjoyed reading it.
In
comparison to other military sf, we could see correspondences, such as
the stock portrayal of boot camp and the formation of bonds among the
new recruits as they become hardened veterans and find their primary
allegiance turned toward their unit and their comrades-in-arms. Carol
related a story about a friend serving in peacekeeping operations in
Kosovo who felt compelled to apologize for a misdeed committed by
someone not in his platoon nor company but still in the same battalion
in which he served. Scalzi did give a good portrait of how military
life reshapes John Perry, his hero, but some of us would like to see it
deepened with some of the darker edges that war chisels onto those who
serve under arms. In fact, the issues of recruitment itself, which
compose a large part of the book, had us arguing over the conceit of
inducting 75-year-olds for their experience (alleged to be vital for
facing the unexpected alien opponents in unforeseen ways), which is
also paired with the idea of creating elite troops from birth (giving
us the unsettling contrast of highly dangerous and deadly 6-year-olds).
The problem that we had for putting these two opposing recruiting
options together into a cohesive military strategy was symptomatic of
the lack of context for the military actions themselves. Working on
the basis of this book alone, we could not say how the Colonial Defense
Forces were organized or why they fought, nor how the Colonial
Government operated and could keep Earth as a quarantined backwater.
Carol did explain how much of the backstory was available in later
books (which she felt were better written), but there was a significant
disconnect for those of us who had not continued with the series as the
first book lacks the "hooks" that would have pointed us toward, if not
the answers, at least the sense that the John and his companions the
Old Farts would be finding them out in future volumes.
One
major stumbling block for many Beamers was the one major hook to the
sequels, John's discover of his dead wife's clone. While it does offer
the obvious way for the narrative to continue ("boy regains girl"), it
occurs under circumstances that have astronomical odds against them
occurring, as John has to be the one survivor of a planetary
assault-turned-ambush who is rescued in turn by the one Ghost Brigade
(special forces) soldier who is Kathy reborn. I noted that the way in
which the injured John is given a brief vision of a female agent come
to carry him, the fallen soldier, away from the battlefield to safety,
was a clone of the fantasy scene of the Valkyrie come to take the
worthy warrior to his reward in Valhalla. In that reading, we need not
worry about the staggering coincidence, because Siegfried and Brunhilde
are fated to meet, and we would be disappointed if they did not.
Similarly, the battle against the 1-inch-tall Covandu was yoked by the
author to John's feelings of himself as Gulliver stomping Lilliputs or
Godzilla crushing Tokyo, both images from fantasy works. (Oh, a
gathering of Philadelphia lawyers has nothing on a Beamer meeting for
turns and twists of rhetoric!) Given that most Beamers were not happy
with the fantasy reading of the book, the coincidental meeting of John
and Jane Sagan (the person "wearing" Kathy's body) was simply a point
where the suspenders of disbelief went "Snap, snap" for them.
Overall,
though, no one was disappointed with spending time to read Scalzi's
first novel, even if we as experienced readers tended to look around
more for the background details than a first novelist who is caught up
in the enthusiastic telling of his tale may be prepared to deliver. If
there was a general fault for the more positive Beamers, it lay in the
overly repetitive battle sequences in the middle of the book, and most
were willing to forgive Scalzi enough to either continue on to his
sequels on their own or had continued or would at least consider
continuing based on the enthusiastic recommendations of same by their
fellow adventurous Beamer colleagues. Volunteers of the army of
Literature that we are, we Beamers do share our own unit bond and do
like to uphold the honor of the Regiment of Readers. Just call us the
Old Farts of F & SF..
Our
September book is the out-of-print sf mystery, "Kiln People" by David
Brin. Beamers having trouble locating a copy should contact Marina for
her assistance. In October, we celebrate Hallowe'en with the humorous
horror of "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies", a parody of the classic
Jane Austen novel with more bone-crunching zombie mayhem than you can
shake a brainstem at. For November, we will dip into a new collection
of galactic empire stories, "Federation", edited by John Joseph Adams
and featuring a wide-ranging cast of classic (Robert Silverberg, Alan
Dean Foster, Anne McCaffrey) and current (Alastair Reynolds, Robert J.
Sawyer, John C. Wright, Catherynne Valente) authors who command a great
deal of respect within the field.
- Eugene, ready to re-enlist for another hitch in the Regiment of Readers ...
 Old Man's War (Mass Market Paperback)$6.29 ISBN-13: 9780765348272Availability: Usually Ships in 1-5 days Published: Tor Science Fiction, 01/01/2007 Bookmark/Search this post with: |
|||
The debate opened with my by kent22
In comparison to other by kent22
